home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- NATION, Page 28There Was Death in the Milk
-
-
- Maybe in fish too, according to a new study of long-ago
- radiation releases from the nuclear reservation in Hanford,
- Wash.
-
-
- Growing up in Moses Lake, Wash., Vicki Skipper suffered
- stomach cramps that continued even after her family moved to
- Connecticut in 1962, when she was eight. Later, she reports,
- "I got swollen glands under my arms, and I had my thyroid
- removed, and they never figured out what it was. I always
- thought it was from the plant, but I could never prove it." A
- federally sponsored panel of scientists and medical experts
- last week, however, indicated that her suspicions -- and those
- of thousands of others who, from the late 1940s until well into
- the 1960s, lived in eight Washington and two northern Oregon
- counties near the Hanford, Wash., nuclear reservation -- are far
- from groundless.
-
- The panel found that between 1944, when it opened, and 1947,
- the Hanford weapons plant poured so much radioactive iodine
- into the air that 1,200 children living nearby were exposed to
- cumulative doses ranging from 15 to 650 rads (one rad is
- roughly equal to the radiation from a dozen chest X rays).
- About 13,500 people, or 5% of the area's total population, may
- have taken in doses of 33 rads or more -- about twice the
- three-year dosage the Nuclear Regulatory Commission considers
- safe for workers exposed to radiation as an occupational
- hazard.
-
- The iodine was released as a gas when fuel rods were
- chemically dissolved in acid as the last step in producing
- plutonium, the explosive material in some nuclear weapons. It
- got into humans mostly because they drank milk from cows that
- had grazed on grass contaminated by airborne iodine. In human
- bodies the iodine tended to concentrate in the thyroid in
- amounts that would have been enough to cause at least some cases
- of cancer.
-
- Though the releases were heaviest between 1944 and 1947 --
- one reason the panel picked that period for study -- they did
- not stop then. "Regulatory standards were not developed until
- the 1950s," the study noted, and not until 1973 did the amount
- of radiation in the atmosphere decrease to the point that it
- could no longer be directly measured. The panel, funded by the
- Department of Energy, also studied releases of radioactive
- substances from nuclear reactors into the Columbia River
- between 1964 and 1966, when some of the heaviest discharges
- occurred. River water was pumped through the reactors to cool
- them. Radioactivity -- in lower doses than the airborne iodine
- -- entered the bodies of people who swam in the river or lived
- or played near it or ate fish caught in it.
-
- The Hanford plant and reactors were shut down in the late
- 1960s; milk, fish and vegetables from the area by now ought to
- be radiation-free. But that is no consolation to those exposed
- to dangerous radiation earlier. A study of health effects of
- the radiation by the Centers for Disease Control will not be
- complete until 1993. If the government is unwilling to offer
- compensation to people who lived near the plant and fell ill
- during the time of heavy discharges, or to their relatives if
- they have died, Washington Senator Brock Adams promises to
- introduce legislation to compel it to do so. Meanwhile, Vicki
- Skipper has perhaps the last word: "When Chernobyl hit, I
- remember thinking that the U.S. sure had a lot of nerve talking
- about Russia when we've been doing the same thing to our
- people."
-
-
- By George J. Church. Reported by Ellis E. Conklin/Seattle and
- Rosanne Spector/Washington.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-